God, just look at him, I mean yeah ESPN obviously took this photo to be unflattering, but tell me this image doesn't scream "douchebag." In truth it is very easy to hate this guy, so cold, so calculated, every step seemingly orchestrated and scripted, teeming with talent and yet seemingly always falling flat on his face whenever he has the chance. Consequently, its not at all surprising to me or anyone who's familiar with Alexander Emanuel Rodriguez the kind of response he'd get when it was found out he took steroids and in truth I can't blame them. He's always made it easy to hate him, even if you're a fan of his team, and his lone gold star, that being the White Knight of Good Clean Home Run Hitting, is forever tarnished, forever clouded in doubt. And now he meets the media finally to speak about his dark past to come clean, and again he is lambasted for it, mocked and ridiculed for it, but for this I don't think he deserves it.
I'm not here to argue that he's innocent or anything like that, he did a wrong thing and he should be singled out for it and be made to answer for it, but here's the thing, he DID answer for it. Alex could've done a lot of things when this came out, deny it up and down like Palmero, Tejada and so many others did, go to congress and make this a crusade against the accusors like Clemens did, or stand trail in a grand jury and lie until he's blue in the face like Bonds did. And yet Alex did none of those things, within 48 hours he came clean he went onto ESPN and spoke with the venerable Peter Gammons and said yes, yes I did take steroids, yes I did a terrible and regrettable thing, and I want everyone to know that I did.
Again, this in itself is unprecedented. Indeed, even Giambi only gave a news conference where he said he was sorry for "something" he never said steroids never said anything like that just that he felt bad. But Alex went further, Alex said okay I'll hold a press conference with all the media present and I'll let you fire away, I'll deal with the brunt of the sports media while they dished out their worse and he spilled his guts. He told him who gave it to him, how many times he took it, how he got it, how long he took it, I mean what else did you want from him, what he was wearing when he was injected? In brief, unlike any other accused steroid user he faced his detractors he took them head on and answered, and yet we are still unsatisfied, but why?
I have heard from many that his explainations were unsatisfactory, that he couldn't have not known what he was taking, that he's hiding behind "I was young and stupid" argument, and most of all that it was disengenious that he didn't seem real. Indeed, you have to consider, if he lied before, why would he stop now? What guarantee do we have that he's not juicing right now? And in truth there is now way for "sure" I am inclined to believe the majority of what he said despite this claims when you consider the situation.
I mean think about it, think about where A-Rod is right now, his career is on the brink of ruin, the only think he had going for him is gone now, now he's a douchebag AND he's dirty. His records are forever tarnished, and his legacy is in doubt, what does he have to lose at this point? He's already been called out as a liar, as a cheat, what good is lying about any stupid detail at this point? Is saying he got it from his cousin rather than another baseball player going to resuce his legacy? Hardly. And the "young and stupid" thing? Well shit I'm 24 and I've done some pretty dumb stuff this year too, is it possible a 24 year old with 252 million dollars in the bank wouldn't do something spectacuarly stupid?
I'm sure there are many who will find my take to be unconvicing, after all, I'm a yankee fan, I'm inclined to want to give a guy on my team a break. But I think that if you sift through the bullshit, A-Rod's past, his throughly irritating demeanor, I think the facts are pretty plain. Alex did something stupid but he's trying to own up to it, he's trying to put himself out there and say look I know I screwed up, but I'm trying to make good, I'm trying to atone for it. Maybe that's not enough for most people, but in my opinon it take a real man to own up to making a colossal mistake like this, and that's more than any of these other cheaters can say.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About me
Just an out of work lawyer looking for work and spending the rest of my time reading, writing and taking everything I can in about the game I love, baseball.
My Blog List
-
-
-
-
RAB: Origins5 years ago
-
-
Some Key Terms to Know When Reading
I throw around a lot of numbers and stats so I figured I should probably explain some of them:
wOBA - a new one I'll be using, short for weighted on-base average is essentially an improvement on OPS. Scaled to average OBP (with .330 the league average) wOBA more properly weighs on-base percentage higher than slugging percentage and more accurately weighs extra base hits (a double isn't worth double of that of a single which is what SLG does) to give a better picture of a batter's worth.
.000/.000/.000 is the industry shorthand for the split stats for batting average, on base percentage, and slugging percentage, in that order, these are some of the more commonly used stats to indicate how productive a hitter is.
OPS - shorthand for On-Base Percentage Plus Slugging is becoming more in vogue in the mainstream media to get a better idea of the raw production of a hitter, instead of saying how often they get a hit OPS shows how productive those hits are.
BABIP - Batting Average on Balls in play, its pretty much what it says, how often that a batter puts in ball in play that it becomes a hit, its a stat that shows if a hitter is just having a lot of bad luck or a hot streak is just fluky. For instance a BABIP of .200 is considered unlucky its not that he's not hitting, he just isn't hitting where the fielders are not there.
OPS+ - as the name implies, OPS+ is OPS but with adjustments to park effects and other outliers to normalize the data. Indeed, as most people know some parks are harder to hit at than others, which this stat compensates for, 100 being the baseline of league average
wOBA - a new one I'll be using, short for weighted on-base average is essentially an improvement on OPS. Scaled to average OBP (with .330 the league average) wOBA more properly weighs on-base percentage higher than slugging percentage and more accurately weighs extra base hits (a double isn't worth double of that of a single which is what SLG does) to give a better picture of a batter's worth.
.000/.000/.000 is the industry shorthand for the split stats for batting average, on base percentage, and slugging percentage, in that order, these are some of the more commonly used stats to indicate how productive a hitter is.
OPS - shorthand for On-Base Percentage Plus Slugging is becoming more in vogue in the mainstream media to get a better idea of the raw production of a hitter, instead of saying how often they get a hit OPS shows how productive those hits are.
BABIP - Batting Average on Balls in play, its pretty much what it says, how often that a batter puts in ball in play that it becomes a hit, its a stat that shows if a hitter is just having a lot of bad luck or a hot streak is just fluky. For instance a BABIP of .200 is considered unlucky its not that he's not hitting, he just isn't hitting where the fielders are not there.
OPS+ - as the name implies, OPS+ is OPS but with adjustments to park effects and other outliers to normalize the data. Indeed, as most people know some parks are harder to hit at than others, which this stat compensates for, 100 being the baseline of league average
WAR - Wins Above Replacement, as its name suggests, provides an exact number of wins a particular player is worth above what your average AAA player, or replacement player would provide in his absence. Although this is a very difficult stat to explain (I don't totally get it personally) the stat is beautifully simple in that it provides a precise value of either a pitcher or hitter to his particular team, which enables teams to monetize their worth and properly assign a dollar value.
ERA+ - similar to OPS+ its a more highly sophisticated way of evaluating a pitcher's performance adjusted for park effects, this also is on a numerical basis with 100 as league average.
FIP - short for fielding independent pitching, FIP measures the only aspects of the game that a pitcher has total control over, strikeouts, walks, and home runs. Scaled to ERA, FIP gives a truer indication of a pitcher's true talent by removing the luck apparent with balls in play.
WHIP - Walks and Hits per innings pitched, a little more well known stat, but a good indicator of how effective a pitcher is. Chances are if a guy is walking a lot of guys and giving up a hot of hits, he's not pitching all that well.
xFIP- a variation of FIP which normalizes home run rates as a way to discount aberrational home run rates that are either too high or too low to reasonably sustain.
UZR- Short of Ultimate Zone Rating, this is the number of runs above or below average a fielder is in both range runs and error runs combined. This is a difficult stat to understand because it's not one of those stats you can figure out at home, because it includes a bevy of factors including park effects and speed. As a consequence, its not a perfect stat, but its the best defensive stat we have. Also seen as UZR/150 is the Ultimate Zone rating per 150 games.
RngR - Range Runs is defined as the number of runs above or below average a fielder is, determined by how the fielder is able to get to balls hit in his vicinity. Also not a perfect fielding stat, but one of the many fielding stats that help as as fans get a fuller picture of a player's defensive prowess.
ERA+ - similar to OPS+ its a more highly sophisticated way of evaluating a pitcher's performance adjusted for park effects, this also is on a numerical basis with 100 as league average.
FIP - short for fielding independent pitching, FIP measures the only aspects of the game that a pitcher has total control over, strikeouts, walks, and home runs. Scaled to ERA, FIP gives a truer indication of a pitcher's true talent by removing the luck apparent with balls in play.
WHIP - Walks and Hits per innings pitched, a little more well known stat, but a good indicator of how effective a pitcher is. Chances are if a guy is walking a lot of guys and giving up a hot of hits, he's not pitching all that well.
xFIP- a variation of FIP which normalizes home run rates as a way to discount aberrational home run rates that are either too high or too low to reasonably sustain.
UZR- Short of Ultimate Zone Rating, this is the number of runs above or below average a fielder is in both range runs and error runs combined. This is a difficult stat to understand because it's not one of those stats you can figure out at home, because it includes a bevy of factors including park effects and speed. As a consequence, its not a perfect stat, but its the best defensive stat we have. Also seen as UZR/150 is the Ultimate Zone rating per 150 games.
RngR - Range Runs is defined as the number of runs above or below average a fielder is, determined by how the fielder is able to get to balls hit in his vicinity. Also not a perfect fielding stat, but one of the many fielding stats that help as as fans get a fuller picture of a player's defensive prowess.
About Me
- burnsie77
- Morristown, NJ, United States
- I write and read everything I can about baseball and have some thoughts about it.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(123)
-
▼
February
(20)
- The Nationals looking, well still pretty bad
- 30 Teams in...Well whenever I get around to it
- The World Baseball Classic, Now Ruining A Team By You
- Dodgers get a steal on the O-dog
- Curious move for a rebuilding team
- The Natural Returns Home
- Pirates making strides to not suck so much
- Now you want to talk douchebags...
- Another day, another chapter in the "A-Roid" Saga
- Yes its true, happier days are here
- Washington Nationals suddenly slightly less crappy
- Angels add to collection of so-so outfielders, sig...
- A-Rod Comes Clean
- The Steroid Era happened, whether you like it or not
- Like A-Rod needed any more bad press
- Only lunatics (like me) need apply
- The Elephant in the Room
- Wrong, wrong again
- Wait a minute...Barry Bonds took steroids????
- Jeff Kent...Hall of Famer?
-
▼
February
(20)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(123)
-
▼
February
(20)
- The Nationals looking, well still pretty bad
- 30 Teams in...Well whenever I get around to it
- The World Baseball Classic, Now Ruining A Team By You
- Dodgers get a steal on the O-dog
- Curious move for a rebuilding team
- The Natural Returns Home
- Pirates making strides to not suck so much
- Now you want to talk douchebags...
- Another day, another chapter in the "A-Roid" Saga
- Yes its true, happier days are here
- Washington Nationals suddenly slightly less crappy
- Angels add to collection of so-so outfielders, sig...
- A-Rod Comes Clean
- The Steroid Era happened, whether you like it or not
- Like A-Rod needed any more bad press
- Only lunatics (like me) need apply
- The Elephant in the Room
- Wrong, wrong again
- Wait a minute...Barry Bonds took steroids????
- Jeff Kent...Hall of Famer?
-
▼
February
(20)
0 comments:
Post a Comment