New York Nine

Baseball the way it was meant to be, down and dirty with brutally honest analysis

seriously, why don't the Brewers wear these unis everday?
Assuming that like myself most of you readers out there are from the East Coast, you probably haven’t given much thought to the Milwaukee Brewers lately (or ever for that matter).  Located in a small market with an owner who’s never shown willingness to make a splashy free agent signing, the Brewers often get overlooked as far as teams that have improved themselves or who seem poised to make the next “big step.”  Nevertheless, while many other teams have made the back page of the newspaper signing guys to astronomical deals, the Brewers have rather quietly gone about improving themselves this offseason in the area they need it most; pitching.  Indeed, despite having such a potent lineup that produced the 4th most runs scored in the National League (11th overall) the Brewers undoubtedly struggled on the rubber, coming in at 14th in pitching in the NL with a very pedestrian 4.58ERA.  Clearly, if the Brewers ever hoped to make the playoffs again, especially with Prince Fielder set to hit the free agent market this coming offseason, Brewers GM Bob Melvin needed to move quickly to get some pitchers, and he clearly delivered.  Through a series of trades, this offseason the Brewers were able to acquire two excellent young pitchers, Zach Grienke and Shawn Marcum, without giving up much of their major league club, and as a result the Brewers appear to be poised to enter the national spotlight and possibly make their run into October.

As the Brewers rotation stands currently, Milwaukee is slated to have their rotation lineup something like Grienke, Yovani Gallardo, Shawn Marcum, Randy Wolf, and Chris Narveson, and this group, no matter how you line them up, is easily ten wins or more better than their rather abysmal 2010 counterparts.  Indeed, with the additions of Grienke and Marcum, the Brewers have been able to replace what was formerly a black hole of replacement-level performance to an undeniable strength of the team heading forward, but to fully appreciate how much of a step up they are we need to look first at whom they are replacing.   Starting first with arguably the worst of the bunch is 32 year old lefty Dave Bush, and even a cursory look at his numbers show him to be a complete non-entity, a pitcher who provides almost exactly what you could expect from any bum in their AAA system for a much higher cost.  For the 2010 season Bush tossed a respectable 174 innings last year, but only struck out 5.52 per nine innings, walked 3.36 per nine innings, while gave up an atrocious 1.45 home runs per nine innings to the tune of a 4.54ERA or a 0.1 Wins Above Replacement, 0.1!  Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure Bush is a nice guy, and being a lefty he’s got at least one thing going for him, however for a contending team you simply cannot have a guy with a 4.54ERA in the National League as your third starter and expect to win any games.  The same is true for the other two bums, Manny Parra and Chris Capuano who put up almost equally horrible numbers.  For Parra, who tossed the majority of the two at 122 innings pitched, Manny showed signs of talent by being able to strike out guys at a much more acceptable rate at 9.52 per nine, however he also walked an unacceptable 4.65 per nine and coughed up almost as many long balls as Bush, at 1.33 per nine.  These numbers, along with his 5.02ERA and equally embarrassing 0.4WAR, is fine if he’s clearly the worst pitcher on the staff, but between Bush as we have seen and Capuano, it’s a neck and neck race.  Hampered by injury issues Chris was limited to only 66 innings, however he was actually the most effective of the bunch with a 3.95ERA and 0.5WAR in that time, but again he also fell prey to the longball at a rate of 1.23 per nine as well.  All and all, If you add up this sorry trio of lefties you get one measly Win Above Replacement for nearly 400 innings in a season; this sort of output may sound like a dream come true for the Pirates, but for a team with two talented young All-Stars like Ryan Braun and Fielder, production like this simply is not acceptable.

Now I don’t mean to impugn the good names of these three pitchers, but when compared with the production of the two pitchers who will be replacing them it’s very easy to fall into it because they’re just so much better.  Starting first with Grienke, winner of the 2009 Cy Young and still only 27, let’s first take a look at his ridiculous numbers that year to give an idea of what this guy is capable of.  In 229 innings, the precocious right hander struck out a tidy 9.5 per nine, walked only 2, and gave up the longball infrequently at a rate of .4 per nine, giving him a 2.16ERA in the American League.  Truly, Grienke’s 2009 season, along with his 9.4 Wins Above Replacement, was one for the ages, and in fact a close look at his 2010 season shows him to be not that far off from those numbers.  Indeed, in 2010 Grienke threw almost the same amount of innings and gave up the same amount of walks and home runs as he did before, but Zach saw a decline in his strikeout rates to 7.4 per nine and his WAR to 5.2.  To be sure, such a precipitous decline in strikeouts is disconcerting and its possible Zach may never reach those heights again, however by moving to the more pitcher-friendly National League the odds of that happening are slim.  In truth, virtually every projection system has Grienke’s numbers bouncing back up again, including Marcel Projections and Bill James who both have his K per nine back to 8 or above, and along with a big spike in his WAR to back to around seven wins.  In short, just by adding Grienke alone the Brewers will have made up the value of the trio of lefties and a lot more, and that’s only the half of it.

In addition, the Brewers also traded for the 28 year old righty Shawn Marcum for their top prospect Brett Lawrie, and again it seems clear that the Brewers made themselves better immediately.  After having Tommy John surgery in 2008, Marcum appeared to come back strong this year and with another year of recovery appears to be poised to be even better moving away from the tough AL East.  Pitching 195 innings last year, Marcum struck out 7.6 per nine and only walked 1.98 per nine during that span, giving up 1.1 home runs, resulting in a 3.64 ERA in the toughest division in baseball; not too shabby.  Like Grienke, I also expect Marcum to benefit enormously from being in the more pitcher friendly league, which should only boost his already expanding value that netted him 3.5WAR last year while really still recovering from major surgery.  The combination of those two factors could easily see Marcum’s value go up by a win or more next year, making both him and Grienke formidable opponents for the rest of the NL Central.

Along with the young fireballer Yovani Gallardo (9.73 K/9, 3.84ERA 4.6WAR), Randy Wolf and Chris Narveson, it’s easy to see the Brewers going from a 77 win team from last year to a possibly 87 win team or more and competing for the NL Central Title. Although the Brewers undoubtedly gave up a lot of talented prospects to do it, and with teams like the defending champion Reds and the perennial contender Cardinals will undoubtedly make life difficult for them all year long, it is clear that these moves have turned the Brewers from an afterthought to a tough day at the ballpark because both Grienke and Marcum are young and cost controlled for the next handful of years.  Unfortunately for Milwaukee, with arguably their best player leaving for free agency next year, this window may be smaller than hoped, but as San Francisco showed this past season great starting pitching and a little bit of hitting is more than enough to get you far into the postseason and beyond. 

Just a note, with baseball season starting I’m going to try to be posting more (as well as possibly a guest post or two in there), but of course that’s all contingent on how much time I have with class and how much I can get myself to write when I’m not in class.  Thanks again for reading.  



                Much has been made the last few weeks and months about Michael Young, his value, and whether he will be traded before the start of the season among baseball circles.  For those who are not familiar, Young, the incumbent third baseman for the AL Champion Texas Rangers has been in flux since the signing of Adrian Beltre for five years $96million (the merits of this contract are dubious at best, but that’s for another day) to play the hot corner.  This is not the first time that the Rangers have made Young change his position for a superior player, having happened with the signing of Alex Rodriguez in 2000 when Young was moved to second,  only to be moved to shortstop after they  traded for Alfonso Soriano in 2004, and finally to third base before the 2009 season to make room for the highly touted shortstop prospect Elvis Andrus; all the same, it seems that this move has been all that Young could bear, and now he is demanding a trade from the Rangers to either the Cardinals, Yankees, Twins, Astros, Rockies, Dodgers, Angels, and the Padres (according to sources).  To be sure, for many teams the prospect of acquiring a six time All Star and Gold Glover to their teams is an exciting one, however there are financial and baseball concerns that make it unclear as to whether he’s “worth” it.  Indeed, at age 33 Young is not a young player by any stretch and to make matters worse he’s owned $48 million over the next three years, which isn’t exactly a bargain.  Nevertheless, it seems clear when compared to their in-house alternatives Michael Young would undoubtedly serve as a significant upgrade for several teams, notably the Colorado Rockies, provided they’re willing to pony up and take the good along with the bad.

                In many respects, Michael Young is the kind of ballplayer any team would love to have on their team.  A hard-working, team first guy, Young has been remarkably durable during his career, having played in at least 155 games every year, except for 2009 when he played 135; and when he’s been out there Young has done nothing but hit.  Indeed, since coming into the league in 2000, Young has had 1,848 hits, ranking 30th among active players, and amassed five 200 hit seasons, and it’s not hard to see why.  For anyone who has seen Michael play more than a few times, it becomes clear that Young is among the best at squaring up the ball on the bat, and his career line drive percentage of 24.1% (compared that to another great “pure” hitter Joe Mauer who’s line drive percentage is only 22.1%) shows that his reputation as a great pure hitter is clearly deserving.  These attributes, as well as his well-documented humility (evidently he’s called the Patron Saint of Sports Sacrifice by local sportswriters for his willingness to move positions so readily) Young has endeared himself to the media and fans alike as a true gamer and competitor, much deservingly earning the tile of Face of the Franchise of the Texas Rangers.

                Clearly, Michael Young has done a great deal in his time as a major leaguer to endear himself to baseball fans everywhere, however from a statistical perspective there is a lot to suggest that Michael is entering a decline phase from which he will likely not return to his All-Star form.  Indeed, in 2010 Young had arguably one of his worst seasons to date, hitting only .284/.330/.444, a stark contrast to his 2009 season when he hit .322/.374/.518, and a closer look at the numbers makes it clear that those numbers are a bit inflated.  Looking at his home/road splits, Young has severely missed the hitter friendly confines of Arlington Park, with a rather measly .753 OPS and 84 OPS+ on the road [note; 100 OPS+ is considered the baseline average replacement-level player] compared to his .859 OPS and 116 OPS+ at home.  On the other side of the diamond, Young has never been a great defender, but the numbers also show he’s slipped considerably with the glove as well, compiling a -5.8 UZR per 150 games at third base last year, down from -4.2 UZR/150 last year.  Even his numbers at other positions like shortstop and second base are no better, averaging a -10.4 UZR at short and a rather pedestrian -.5 at second respectively.  All in all, these numbers strongly suggest that Michael Young is a guy whose best days might be possibly behind him.   Sure it’s entirely possible that he regains his form of being a 200 hits a year guy, but at $16million a year that is a gamble that most teams are not financially able to take.

                Now, all that negative stuff said about Michael Young, here’s why I think that this is a gamble for at least one team, the Rockies.  For those who weren’t following or don’t care to remember, the Rockies fell short of the postseason last year after petering out in October, and in all likelihood part of that decline came from the lack of a viable candidate at second base.  Indeed, for the season a collection of such notable bums like Clint Barmes, Jonathan Herrera, Eric Young Jr., and Melvin Mora totaled an absolutely horrific stat line of .246 batting average, six home runs and 63 RBIs while playing second base, and in truth things aren’t looking any better next season.  Since last year the incumbent Barmes was shipped off to Houston, leaving only Eric Young Jr., as the de-facto second baseman and his numbers are even worse at .244/.312/.285, with little coming down the pipeline that is better.  To be sure, a team that with star power like Troy Tulowitski and Carlos Gonzalez that hopes to contend the Rockies simply cannot afford to have such a gaping hole in their lineup, which is why trading for  a guy like Michael Young makes a whole lot of sense.  Now granted, Young has not played second base regularly for some time and in truth considering his numbers at short and third chances are he’ll be crappy with the glove, but his bat more than makes up for it. Indeed, even if he duplicates his current batting line, Young’s OPS is a solid .200 points higher than any other option they have internally and in fact Young’s career low batting average to balls in play (.311 to .350) suggests that he will be even better in Colorado.  Add in the fact that Young is moving to the National League West and Coors Field, where the pitchers aren’t as good and Coors is arguably the only better hitters park than Arlington, Young could easily go back to being a 4 Wins Above Replacement Player in no time and dare I say it, the difference between Colorado contending and watching the playoffs from home.

               Of course, I am not privy to Colorado’s finances so I don’t know if they could swing this deal, but the numbers clearly show that Young would undeniably represent a serious upgrade for the Rockies.   Although his glove is undoubtedly suspect, and he may never have 200 hits in a season, the fact remains that Michael Young is still a very good ballplayer who can help a club in need.  Unfortunately for Texas, there is no longer a space for him on the team and in all likelihood they will have to pay to send him away, but for whichever team takes a chance on him will be getting a consummate professional and a pure hitter for much less than what he’s really worth.  

Thursday, February 3, 2011

So Long, Andy



The 2010-11 offseason for the New York Yankees has been to say the least, frustrating.  From the tenuous Derek Jeter contract negotiations that incited so much argument amongst the parties involved and the fans, to losing out on Cliff Lee after offering more money and more years than the Phillies, to signing “reclamation project” pitchers like Bartolo Colon, and now the final nail in the coffin, the great Andy Pettitte has announced his retirement, it’s not exactly been a great time for the Yanks.  To be sure, by all objective measures the Yankees are still in a great position to at least compete for a division title coming off a 95 win season, and their failures pale in comparison to say the Mets and their financial woes or the countless other small market teams who are resigned to being cellar dwellers another year, but this isn’t just any team, this is the Yankees, and the Yankees are supposed to compete.  Now for pretty much any other team, those kinds of expectations are crazy, but especially for Yankee fans my age that’s the only reality we know.  To put the Yankees dominance in perspective, just this last week a 42 year old relief pitcher named Russ Springer retired this last week after 18 seasons in the big leagues.  The significance?  That same relief pitcher was briefly on the 1992 New York Yankees in his rookie season, the last season the Yankees didn’t go at least .500, and Russ is the last active player to have played on a sub-.500 Yankee team.  Think about that, there isn’t a player in the league who can say he’s been on a losing Yankee team, how did the Yankees accomplish such a feat?  What have the Yankees done to defy the odds for so long and find ways to produce a winning product for a generation?  The detractors out there will point to the Yankees’ unparalled resources to their success, but in truth much of the answer to this question lies with the contributions of Andy Pettitte.  Although Andy would not actually start pitching until 1995, Andy his 16 seasons in the big leagues was a big reason why the Yankees have been so successful for all these years, and task of filling his shoes will be more challenging than we know.

If one were to look at Andy Pettitte simply by his numbers it can be difficult to truly encapsulate his value to the Yankees (and the Astros for three years) because by in large his statistics aren’t that fantastic. Indeed, in sixteen seasons, Andy complied 240 wins, a 3.88 ERA, 2,251 strikeouts to 962 walks (coming out to a 2.34 K/BB ratio) in the regular season, and none of those numbers really scream “Hall of Famer.”  Even his much lauded postseason resume, where he holds the record for most postseason wins at 19, Andy’s numbers are really not as impressive when you consider the fact that he benefitted from being on the Yankees during a run they were always in the playoffs, as well as the introduction of the wild card in 1995.  What’s more, his numbers for the postseason are pretty much in line with his career numbers with a 3.83ERA and a 2.40 K/BB ratio, so even on the biggest stage he’s had his ups and downs too.  But in truth conventional statistics don’t really speak to Andy Pettitte’s greatness and why he was one of my favorite players.  Emma Span at BronxBanterblog.com I think put it best today saying;

Even more so in his later years, when he relied less on stuff and more on control and, for lack of a better phrase, know-how. The stat-head in me hates using wishy washy phrases like that — he had grit! he was gutty! — but like I said, when it comes to Pettitte I really can’t help myself. 

Much like Emma, I too hate having to rely on baseball clichés when talking about Andy, but there’s really no other way to describe how he did it.  What I mean by that becomes clearer when you look at Andy’s seasons one by one, even his excellent ones, which shows that even though he didn’t blow anybody away, and he wasn’t exactly Greg Maddux with his control, at the end of the day Andy just got it done.  Take for instance Andy’s 1996 season, where he was arguably the best pitcher on the team as a 21 year old and he complied a record of 21-8 to the tune of a 3.87ERA, but he gave up 229 hits in 221 innings, only struck out 162 while walking 72, and he gave up 23 home runs, 23!  Keep in mind this is arguably Andy’s best season, and even then no one would confuse him for Sandy Koufax, but it didn’t matter because he won.  I remember watching Andy that season as a fourth grader and just being amazed at this guy and how he did what he had to do to win games for the Yankees, and he kept doing it year after year.  Whether it be the World Series, a big weekend at Boston, or even a forgettable Monday night game against Baltimore, Andy has always been a guy you felt like you had a chance to win with when he’s on the mound, and that’s more than you can say about most.

It’s hard to be angry at Pettitte for deciding that he had enough after sixteen seasons, but the selfish fan in me wishes he could’ve given us just a little more because I loved watching him so much.  Even when he left town for Houston, or when he admitted to having used Human Growth Hormone, myself and the rest of Yankee fans always forgave him immediately because he was always seemed so gracious, so down to earth, and most of all a winner (I’m just full of baseball clichés today, Pettitte brings the worst out of me).  I remember a story a friend told me about the 2009 World Series before the sixth and series clinching game, and he and his buddies were tailgating outside before the game.  As they’re sitting in the Yankee Stadium parking lot they see Andy drive by and he saw them all freaking out cheering for him at the top of their lungs, and what does he do?  He gets out fired up as hell and starts giving them high-fives telling them he’s going to “fuck shit up” and win this game; that’s the kind of guy his is.  What made me love watching Andy so much was that  even when he wasn’t feeling it or was getting knocked around a little he just seemed to want it more than the other guy, and when it mattered most in the big spots he wanted the ball and was going to give everything he’s got to beat the other man.  Maybe that doesn’t make him a Hall of Famer, and maybe the less Yankee-friendly statheads will roll their collective eyes at my anecdotal evidence, but that’s enough for me because that’s all I can ask for as a fan.  Thanks Andy.