New York Nine

Baseball the way it was meant to be, down and dirty with brutally honest analysis

Friday, December 30, 2011

The Cardinals and the Post-Pujols Era


    
            On the heels of one of the most exciting and thrilling World Series in recent memory, the World Champion St. Louis Cardinals head into the 2012 season a very different team.  If you haven’t heard (but I’m sure you have) the Cardinals signature player, the man most associated with “The Cardinal Way” since Stan “The Man” Musial, Albert Pujols rejected the Cardinals’ offer and signed with the Anaheim Angels to a monstrous 10 year $254million deal.  To be sure, combined with the loss of their Hall of Fame Manager Tony LaRussa, the loss of Pujols has to leave any halfway sane Cardinals fan feeling like the team is about to go down the tubes, however the reality of the situation is far less dire.  While the loss of the future Hall of Famer will certainly hurt the Cardinals in the short term, the addition of new players or injured players like Carlos Beltran and Adam Wainwright will help alleviate that drop off and enable the Cardinals to not have to pay Albert big bucks as he enters his decline phase as a player.

                Of all the moves the Cardinals have made this off-season, none has the potential to soften the blow of losing Albert Pujols than the signing of six-time All-Star Carlos Beltran.  After a surprisingly quiet free agency for Carlos, Cardinals GM John Mozeliak signed Beltran to a 2 year/$26million dollar deal that undoubtedly has some risk, but a great deal of upside.  Although missing some time to begin the year, between his stints with the Mets and Giants, Carlos displayed his keen eye at the plate and still prodigious power despite playing in some of the worst home run parks in the game, playing in 142 games and hitting to the tune of a .300/.385/.525 slash-line, with 39 doubles, 22 home runs and a .389wOBA.  These numbers, although hardly Pujols-esque, are still easily among the best in the league for an outfielder and should only be improved by the move to a far more hitter-friendly park in St. Louis.  Nevertheless, as any Mets fan (or Giants fan) will tell you, Carlos is not the same guy he was a few years ago.  For starters, Beltran, who has always been injury prone and has some bum knees, one of which required microfracture surgery, but instead chose to undergo less evasive arthroscopic surgery and it has clearly been to his detriment.  No longer a graceful runner in center field, Carlos was forced to move to right field and clearly was not the same player, posting a UZR/150 of -9.2 between his stints in New York and San Francisco, as well as a less than impressive -11.0 RngR.  Entering his age 35 season, Beltran could very well see these knee problems affect his effectiveness at the plate and may turn out to be a bad signing, but the point is the risk isn’t all that great.  While he is older and could very well fall off a cliff, the fact of the matter is Carlos was worth 4.7WAR last season, which comes out to about to being worth about $22million.  Even if it does fall off a bit, the Cardinals are still likely to get a great deal of value from Carlos and be well worth the money over two years.

                In addition to the help coming from outside the Cardinals organization, help from inside the organization in the form of Staff Ace Adam Wainwright should also significantly soften the blow of the loss of Pujols.  Adam injured his elbow last spring training and was forced to miss the entirety of the 2011 season to recover from Tommy John Surgery; in the past this would cause concern that he may never regain his former ace form, however the ridiculously high success rate these days makes him a good bet to be as good as new.  For certain, it is a testament to the Cardinals last year that they were able to overcome the loss of Wainwright and win the Series because he was so damn valuable to them in years prior.  Indeed, in his last full season in 2010 Wainwright was an Ace in every sense of the word, tossing an impressive 230 innings to the tune of a 2.32 ERA (and a 2.86 FIP to back it up) and displaying excellent control, with 8.32K/9 and an even more impressive 3.80 K/BB ratio, which was among the top five in the senior circuit that year.  Of course, like any surgery there is always an element of risk that Adam may not be the same guy he was, but again given his age (just 30) and the success rate of Tommy John (many pitchers are even better after Tommy John), it’s hard to not see Wainwright come close to his 6.1WAR from that season, which again was worth according to Fangraphs.com over $24million to the Cardinals.  Between the two the Cardinals are adding potentially ten wins to their team, which although will not exactly replace what a superstar like Pujols gives a team, undoubtedly gives the team a very good chance to be in the mix come October next year.

                Of course, as wonderful as these players may be for the Cardinals, neither of them are Albert Pujols; though in light of Albert’s age and uncharacteristically down year, the Cardinals may have dodged a bullet.  Of course, at least in the short term it’s hard to not like the move by the Angels in signing Pujols for the simple reason is that he’s Albert Freaking Pujols, the best baseball player on the planet.  While still only 32 Albert has already put together a Hall of Fame resume, accumulating 87.8WAR for his career, 445 home runs, a .328/.420/.617 slash-line, ten all star games, three MVP awards, and two gold gloves; this isn’t just a great player we’re talking about here, we’re talking about a guy on the short list of being one of the greatest of all time and arguably the best first baseman since Lou Gehrig, and he’s not even done.  Nevertheless, while the Angels were smart to acquire a player of Pujols’ stature under any circumstances there are reasons for concern.  For one, Albert is coming off what was easily his worst season to date, where he hit ‘only’ .299/.366/.541 with 37 home runs and 29 doubles.  To be fair, these are not bad numbers by any measure, and furthermore Albert admitted the specter of his contract negotiations affected his play, however these are not numbers of an all time great that the Angels are paying for.  Although most projection systems forecast a return to glory for Albert (Bill James and Fangraphs project him to have approximately a .319/.410/.585 stat line) it is entirely possible that Albert’s best days are behind him.  Players like Jimmy Foxx, Mel Ott, Albert Belle and a host of others saw a steep decline after they turned 32 making it substantially likely that Albert do the same.  Moreover, Albert’s contract, while fair relative to his value as a player could potentially be an albatross to the Angels in the long term.  As reported by Ken Rosenthal, Albert’s contract is very back-loaded, with him getting only around $16million now and the second half getting over $30million which could very well hurt the Angels’ ability to compete if Albert isn’t Albert anymore.    One can’t help but think of the example of Alex Rodriguez, who also got a ten year deal after his age 32 and has declined considerably in the four years since, and wonder if Albert will suffer a similar fate.   However unlike the Cardinals who despite their rapid fans are very much a mid-market ball club, the Angels in light of their huge new TV deal and the decline of the Dodgers in the LA market can afford to make such a gamble.  Given these risks it seems very likely that in a few years Cardinals fans may be very well thanking the Angels for paying Albert all that money to leave for Sunny Southern California.
   
             Even in light of all these very rational reasons to feel better about the Cardinals long term without Albert Pujols than with him, it will still be hard for Cardinals fans to see Albert Pujols wearing a red hat with a Halo instead of a Red Bird.  Players like Pujols don’t come along very often, so to see him leave in the middle of his career after so many great moments has to be disheartening.  Nevertheless, given the rather astute moves Mr. Mozeliak has made to make the Post-Pujols Era not so frightening, Cardinal fans have a litany of reasons to believe that the division titles, pennants and World Series championships will not leave town with Albert.  And even the Cards aren’t as good as they once were, Cardinal fans should take solace in knowing that for a decade they had the honor and privilege of seeing one of the best that ever lived play in their home town, and that’s a lot more than most baseball or indeed any sports fan can say with a straight face.  

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Austerity in the Bronx


                By all accounts, The New York Yankees in the post-Steinbrenner era has been an undeniably strange one for Yankee fans.  Once the champions of the back of the sports page vying for the top the free agents or hottest trade target on the market, the past few years have seen the Yankees embracing austerity, searching for bargain basement deals and resisting the temptation to deal their highly touted prospects in order to let them practice their wares in pinstripes on the cheap.  To be sure, coming off a 97 win season on the strength of surprising performances by the likes of Bartolo Colon, Freddy Garcia, and Ivan Nova, this formula has worked well in the short term, and in turn enabled GM Brian Cashman to lower to the payroll to a somewhat reasonable $189 payroll (by Yankee standards), but will this strategy work in the years to come? The answer to this question it seems rests on the young shoulders of Jesus Montero, Manny Banuelos and several others coming along the Yankee farmhand pipeline and the ability of high priced veterans like A-Rod, Jeter and Teixeria to stay healthy and live up to their contracts.

                Arguably the most important piece of the puzzle for the Yankees is the continued growth and success of the 22 year old uber-prospect Jesus Montero.  Blocked most of the year at both catcher and designated hitter by Russell Martin and Jorge Posada, Jesus finally got a shot in September and did not disappoint.  Although limited to a mere 69 plate appearances, Montero’s potential was on display to the Yankee faithful, hitting an impressive .328/.406/.590 with four home runs, three of which went to the opposite field.  Now with Jorge gone and likely retired, it seems that Jesus will finally be able to find at bats consistently next year, however questions remain regarding his defensive ability and the Yankees’ desire to have a full time DH.  In truth, especially with Derek Jeter and Alex Rodriguez getting older and more brittle Yankee Manager Joe Girardi will likely want to give a great deal of those DH ABs to them in order to keep their legs fresh over the whole season, thereby likely limiting his ability to get 500 at bats there.  And the catcher position is equally problematic for Jesus, given the fact that Russell Martin has established himself as one of the better defensive catchers in the AL whereas Jesus’ reputation as a catcher has been characterized as dubious at best.  Indeed, virtually every scout from Keith Law of ESPN to John Sickels of Baseball America has seriously questioned his ability to be an effective defensive catcher due to his size and general lack of mobility behind the plate.  Nevertheless, Brian Cashman has been adamant that like Jorge Posada before him, Montero can become an effective catcher with more reps and patience and has been reluctant to consider him a full time DH.  If Mr. Cashman is right, Montero offers the Yankees production at the catcher position that could easily meet or exceed Posada’s production in his prime, providing the Yankees with cheap, cost-controlled 30 home run power at one of the most difficult positions on the diamond.

                As important as Montero will be to the Yankees in the years to come, the success of the Yankees in 2012 largely rests on the shoulders of Ivan Nova and Phil Hughes, the young promising pitchers on the staff.  Although their histories are quite different, Hughes coming up at age 20 with huge expectations while Nova a Rule-5 pick who struggled just to get on the roster, both have proved to be important contributors to the Yankees in the past two years, with Phil winning 18 games in 2010 and Ivan winning 17 despite being sent down during part of the year.  Nevertheless, there are reasons for concern for both heading forward.  Phil Hughes in particular has had issues staying healthy, going down for a large part of this season and even when he was healthy he was less than stellar, posting a career worst 5.70ERA, a 5.67 K/9 and not so reassuring FIP of 4.58.  These numbers may be an aberration, given his huge jump in innings pitched the year before, going from 86 in 2009 to 176 in 2010 (not including the post-season), but there remain larger concerns regarding his ability to get major league hitters out effectively.  Indeed, despite attempts to add a third pitch, Hughes has been largely be unable to find a put away pitch to complement his stellar fastball and curve, and as a result he has become an extreme fly ball pitcher with an astounding 44.8% FB rate last year (worst in the MLB last year).  This inability to get ground ball outs, particularly in light of his home stadium, Yankee Stadium, a notorious home run haven, makes the former phenom decidedly not a sure bet to return to form.

                Conversely, for Ivan Nova, the young righty hopes to avoid a similar sophomore slump to that of Hughes despite some rather unimpressive peripheral stats.  Indeed, although possessing an impressive fastball and an improving slider, Ivan has had trouble striking guys out at a level comparable to top flight starters in the league, posting a rather pedestrian 5.33K/9 and a downright problematic 3.10BB/9.  Of course, it would be unfair to say that these numbers are representative of his actual success, as Nova’s ERA and FIP both steadily declined each month, posting a 3.82ERA and 3.20FIP in his final month of the season, making him easily the Yankees second most reliable starter down the stretch, but it is hard to ignore the healthy amount of luck Ivan got during those months, holding hitters to a BABIP of .283 and leaving base runners stranded on base at a truly unsustainable level of 73.2%.  All of these statistics and more make Ivan a surer bet than Hughes, but still not quite a pitcher whom you can put down in ink as a true number two pitcher behind CC Sabbathia.  Indeed, it is certainly possible that Nova keeps up his good fortune, but like Hughes the only way to ensure future success is development of a third and equally effective pitch.

                In another era in Yankee history, these young and unproven players would likely not be relied on so heavily to produce in pinstripes, however it seems that the rather onerous contracts of some of New York’s veteran stars have forced Mr. Cashman to pinch some pennies.  Indeed, thanks to contracts given out to more established stars like Alex Rodriguez (making $30million a year), Mark Texieria ($23million per year) Cashman has had to fight hard to keep the Yankees under the luxury tax threshold while still remaining competitive. The only problem it seems is that these highly salaried stars have not lived up to their rather weighty contracts in the past two years.  Particularly for Texieria the decline has been quite rapid and damaging, going from hitting a stellar .292/.383/.565 in 2009 to last year only managing a rather pedestrian .248/.341/.494; these numbers may be fine for a first baseman on a mid-market team, however when you’re paying over $20million to the guy, you’re not exactly getting a lot of bang for your buck.  Certainly, many will point to Texieria’s home run totals, of which he has kept constant, hitting 39 dingers this year, the same as his 2009 season, however it seems that the power has come at the expense of his formerly keen batting eye and ability to hit to all fields.  In fact, Mark has admitted as much that he became too enamored by the short porch in right field at Yankee Stadium, but mere awareness of the problem won’t be enough for Mark to regain his form.  Time and time again this postseason Texieria looked hapless at the plate, swinging wildly at bad pitches by the Tigers staff, and in order for New York to overcome the Rangers, Tigers, Red Sox and more of the league these tendencies must come to an end.

                Finally, I would be remiss if I did not discuss Alex Rodriguez and his rather precipitous decline because of the apparent damage it has done to the overall strength of the Yankee lineup.  Now entering his age 37 season, the days of Alex’s MVP runs with 54 home runs and stellar defense are clearly behind him, and along with it his famous durability.  Indeed, after never having played less than 125 games his entire career, Alex couldn’t even break the 100 game mark in 2011 due to nagging hip issues, and as a result his overall numbers saw a sharp regression to the mean.  Although Alex was able to still get on base at a healthy rate of .362, Rodriguez saw a sharp decline in batting average and power (.277 and .461 respectively, the first time he posting a slugging percentage lower than .500 since 1998!) resulting in only 16 home runs.  Of course, at Alex’s age in the post-steroid era (Ryan Braun notwithstanding) a regression is expected, but with six years left on his monstrous $300million dollar deal a decline so sharp so early is really hurting the Yankees’ ability to compete.  Even more than Texieria, the Yankees need Alex to come somewhere near his former levels of production at the plate in order to provide protection for the new big bats of the Yankee lineup in Robinson Cano and Curtis Granderson.
  
              To be sure, the notion of austerity for the Yankees is undoubtedly quite different than that of the Kansas Cities and Pittsburghs of the world, but it’s clearly a departure from business as usual in the Bronx.  Whereas in past years I would have expected Cashman to make a big bid on Japanese pitching phenom Yu Darvish, instead the Yankees weren’t even in the same stratosphere as the bids by former Bronx punching bags Texas and Toronto.  This is not to say that the Yankees will not be able to compete with the new big spenders for the pennant year in and year out in the future, but it is clear that now more than ever, the Yankees must find ways to spend money wisely.  As any halfway knowledgeable Yankee fan will tell you, big spending will not necessarily ensure success and in fact (thanks for nothing Carl Pavano, Jared Wright etc etc), as in the cases of Alex Rodriguez and Texieria presently, big spending now can often hamstring a team from making the team better due to the financial burden of a big time deal.  Luckily for New York, in Brian Cashman the Yankees are fortunate enough to have one of the most adept and competent General Managers in the game, one who does not necessarily get the same fan-fare of Theo Epstein or Andrew Friedman, but who has the record and the rings to show that he knows a thing or two about putting a baseball team together.  More than any one asset, Cashman is the key to success for the Yankees in the future to find ways to win without the bottomless wallet of the late George M. Steinbrenner.  

Monday, December 26, 2011

Marlins Spend Big, Risk Bigger



                              Since their inception in 1993 the Florida (now Miami) Marlins have never been an organization that has been content to abide by the conventional wisdom of baseball.  Whereas many much older and more established franchises are content to wait patiently to develop prospects and cultivate a fan base to increase revenues and then in turn raise spending, the Marlins under owner Jeffery Loria, despite a laughably small fan base, have eschewed long term thinking and gone about trying to win now and worrying about the consequences later.  Twice now since its inception the Marlins have staggeringly reached the mountaintop of baseball, in 1997 and 2003 respectively, only to quickly dissemble these teams in wholesale fire-sales, leaving the franchise barren of talent for years to come.   Now on the precipice of opening a new ballpark in Miami (with some of the worst uniforms ever to hit major league sports) it seems Mr. Loria and the Marlins have forgone the old formula and engaged on a spending spree, going after and getting many of the best free agents available, and now seem poised to make their presence felt in the NL East.  Nevertheless, given the recent developments of an ongoing SEC investigation due to a rather fishy stadium deal as well as questions regarding their ability to draw fans, questions remain as to whether Mr. Loria’s big bets will work, both on the balance sheet and on the ball field.  

                Arguably the most dramatic and potentially impactful change the Marlins made this year was the signing of former Met favorite, shortstop Jose Reyes.  Coming off the heels of a fantastic season where he hit .337/.384/.493 with 39 steals and a league leading 16 triples, Miami stole Reyes away from their NL East rival with a huge 6 year $106million dollar deal.  By all accounts, the Marlins acquired a game-changing player at the shortstop position, a wizard on the basepaths with 370 career steals, an above average defender at one of the most demanding defensive positions, accumulating a 2.1+ UZR/150 over his career, and most importantly a true ‘sparkplug’ of a hitter, getting on base and with power to the tune of a .368wOBA last year.  Moreover, despite his reputation as being injury prone, a closer look at his games played shows that Reyes has only had one season where he played less than a 125 games in a season since he became a full-time starter, making him not only valuable but durable as well, despite the rigors of the shortstop position.  The only problem is the Marlins already had a game-changing shortstop in Hanley Ramirez who since the Reyes signing has been quite clear that his has no intention of moving off his position for a player that has been arguably been his inferior over his career (.346wOBA Reyes career - .385wOBA Ramirez career).  Nevertheless, despite Hanley’s misgivings about the move and potential concerns about him ‘getting along’ with Jose it’s hard to not see this as a huge upgrade,  essentially replacing Emilo Bonafacio’s 3.3WAR last year on the infield for Reyes’ 6.4.  Those wins, in all likelihood, will mean a lot in a tight NL East race.

                From here, the Marlins sought to upgrade their rotation, and after striking out on top pitching free agent C.J. Wilson, the Marlins ‘settled’ on the more accomplished and more cost effective lefty Mark Buehrle for four years and $58million.  At first glance when comparing Wilson and Buehrle, given their raw stuff and recent success (Wilson has been the Rangers’ top starter for the last two years while Buehrle has gone unnoticed on several bad White Sox teams) it would seem that Miami really lost out, however a careful look at Mark’s body of work shows that he has been one of the most durable and reliable starters in the past decade.  Indeed, aside from throwing a no hitter and a perfect game in the last few years Buehrle has been the definition of a workhorse, throwing over 205 innings every year since 2002 and more importantly throwing quality innings.  In fact, while a cursory look at Buehrle’s statistics might scare away most teams with his 4.78ERA, his Fielding Independent Pitching Data or FIP was 3.98 which is in fact consistent with his entire career.  This statistic is more impressive when one considers that Mark has had some of the worst defenses in the league playing behind him in recent years (Chicago has been in the bottom five in UZR in the last three years) in addition to pitching half of his games at U.S. Cellular, which has been consistently rated as one of the biggest home run launching pads in baseball.  In short, with his quick delivery to the plate and his ability to throw strikes consistently Buehrle has been one of the most underrated and most reliable starters in the game, and given the going rate for top flight starting pitching on the open market $58million is a downright steal.  Adding Mark to an already promising rotation of Josh Johnson, Ricky Nolasco and Anibal Sanchez, it’s not hard to see the Marlins competing with the class of the senior circuit. 

                Finally, in addition to signing one of the best position players and starting pitchers, the Marlins also snagged one of the best closers on the market in Heath Bell.  Signing for a relatively reasonable price of 3 years $29million (especially compared to the $50million the Phillies gave Jonathan Papelbon) the Marlins seem to have cemented their bullpen with one of the most consistent closers pitching today.  Indeed, since taking over the closer role in San Diego from Trevor Hoffmann, Bell has been among the tops in saves leaders, accumulating 132 saves in three years, and doing it in dominating fashion, with an ERA of 3.05 and an FIP of 2.55.  And even though this past year saw Bell’s strikeout numbers drop considerably from 11.09K/9 to 7.32K/9, given his age and consistent success most analysts are confident that these numbers are aberrational, as both Bill James and Fangraphs.com project those numbers to be around 9 K/9 next year.  Although closers are traditionally more volatile than other positions and his recent decline are reasons for concern, it again is difficult to argue that Bell does not represent an upgrade and some badly needed consistency in the Marlins bullpen, especially considering that their last closer, Leo Nunez, turned out to be using a fake name and passport and may possibly lose his opportunity to play in the bigs again.

               In spite of these additions to the Marlins, which as stated above are undoubtedly significant, there are reasons for concern.  For starters, reports by FOX’s Ken Rosenthal and others have suggested that these big deals are heavily backloaded, making them potential albatrosses for the organization if the deals don’t work and don’t result in more success in the short term.  Moreover, the Miami Herald has reported that the SEC is now investigating the financial records of the Marlins and demanded lists of investors and any political contributions made to Miami politicians.  This last charge is particularly troublesome for the organization because it begs the question of where is all this money that the Marlins are paying out coming from?  The stadium itself is being financed almost entirely by Florida taxpayers, whom foot over 80% of the entire cost, and the team itself is among the league’s lowest in both game attendance and revenue.  How could a team who can barely get 10,000 people show up to their games pay out hundreds of millions of dollars to top flight free agents and not go bankrupt?  The answers to these questions at the moment remain unclear, but what is clear is that the Marlins are taking some very substantial risks that might not pay off.  While the team has undoubtedly improved substantially, the Marlins still must overcome a still-potent Philadelphia Phillies team, a young and emerging Atlanta Braves team, and quite possibly the Washington Nationals as well (sorry Mets fans, I feel for you guys, but it’s not looking great for the short term for you).  These moves and several others may very well be the magic elixir that returns the Marlins to their not so distant past glory, however if they do not they may very well prove to be rather costly mistakes for both the Marlins and the citizens of Florida who may be paying for it. 

seriously, why don't the Brewers wear these unis everday?
Assuming that like myself most of you readers out there are from the East Coast, you probably haven’t given much thought to the Milwaukee Brewers lately (or ever for that matter).  Located in a small market with an owner who’s never shown willingness to make a splashy free agent signing, the Brewers often get overlooked as far as teams that have improved themselves or who seem poised to make the next “big step.”  Nevertheless, while many other teams have made the back page of the newspaper signing guys to astronomical deals, the Brewers have rather quietly gone about improving themselves this offseason in the area they need it most; pitching.  Indeed, despite having such a potent lineup that produced the 4th most runs scored in the National League (11th overall) the Brewers undoubtedly struggled on the rubber, coming in at 14th in pitching in the NL with a very pedestrian 4.58ERA.  Clearly, if the Brewers ever hoped to make the playoffs again, especially with Prince Fielder set to hit the free agent market this coming offseason, Brewers GM Bob Melvin needed to move quickly to get some pitchers, and he clearly delivered.  Through a series of trades, this offseason the Brewers were able to acquire two excellent young pitchers, Zach Grienke and Shawn Marcum, without giving up much of their major league club, and as a result the Brewers appear to be poised to enter the national spotlight and possibly make their run into October.

As the Brewers rotation stands currently, Milwaukee is slated to have their rotation lineup something like Grienke, Yovani Gallardo, Shawn Marcum, Randy Wolf, and Chris Narveson, and this group, no matter how you line them up, is easily ten wins or more better than their rather abysmal 2010 counterparts.  Indeed, with the additions of Grienke and Marcum, the Brewers have been able to replace what was formerly a black hole of replacement-level performance to an undeniable strength of the team heading forward, but to fully appreciate how much of a step up they are we need to look first at whom they are replacing.   Starting first with arguably the worst of the bunch is 32 year old lefty Dave Bush, and even a cursory look at his numbers show him to be a complete non-entity, a pitcher who provides almost exactly what you could expect from any bum in their AAA system for a much higher cost.  For the 2010 season Bush tossed a respectable 174 innings last year, but only struck out 5.52 per nine innings, walked 3.36 per nine innings, while gave up an atrocious 1.45 home runs per nine innings to the tune of a 4.54ERA or a 0.1 Wins Above Replacement, 0.1!  Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure Bush is a nice guy, and being a lefty he’s got at least one thing going for him, however for a contending team you simply cannot have a guy with a 4.54ERA in the National League as your third starter and expect to win any games.  The same is true for the other two bums, Manny Parra and Chris Capuano who put up almost equally horrible numbers.  For Parra, who tossed the majority of the two at 122 innings pitched, Manny showed signs of talent by being able to strike out guys at a much more acceptable rate at 9.52 per nine, however he also walked an unacceptable 4.65 per nine and coughed up almost as many long balls as Bush, at 1.33 per nine.  These numbers, along with his 5.02ERA and equally embarrassing 0.4WAR, is fine if he’s clearly the worst pitcher on the staff, but between Bush as we have seen and Capuano, it’s a neck and neck race.  Hampered by injury issues Chris was limited to only 66 innings, however he was actually the most effective of the bunch with a 3.95ERA and 0.5WAR in that time, but again he also fell prey to the longball at a rate of 1.23 per nine as well.  All and all, If you add up this sorry trio of lefties you get one measly Win Above Replacement for nearly 400 innings in a season; this sort of output may sound like a dream come true for the Pirates, but for a team with two talented young All-Stars like Ryan Braun and Fielder, production like this simply is not acceptable.

Now I don’t mean to impugn the good names of these three pitchers, but when compared with the production of the two pitchers who will be replacing them it’s very easy to fall into it because they’re just so much better.  Starting first with Grienke, winner of the 2009 Cy Young and still only 27, let’s first take a look at his ridiculous numbers that year to give an idea of what this guy is capable of.  In 229 innings, the precocious right hander struck out a tidy 9.5 per nine, walked only 2, and gave up the longball infrequently at a rate of .4 per nine, giving him a 2.16ERA in the American League.  Truly, Grienke’s 2009 season, along with his 9.4 Wins Above Replacement, was one for the ages, and in fact a close look at his 2010 season shows him to be not that far off from those numbers.  Indeed, in 2010 Grienke threw almost the same amount of innings and gave up the same amount of walks and home runs as he did before, but Zach saw a decline in his strikeout rates to 7.4 per nine and his WAR to 5.2.  To be sure, such a precipitous decline in strikeouts is disconcerting and its possible Zach may never reach those heights again, however by moving to the more pitcher-friendly National League the odds of that happening are slim.  In truth, virtually every projection system has Grienke’s numbers bouncing back up again, including Marcel Projections and Bill James who both have his K per nine back to 8 or above, and along with a big spike in his WAR to back to around seven wins.  In short, just by adding Grienke alone the Brewers will have made up the value of the trio of lefties and a lot more, and that’s only the half of it.

In addition, the Brewers also traded for the 28 year old righty Shawn Marcum for their top prospect Brett Lawrie, and again it seems clear that the Brewers made themselves better immediately.  After having Tommy John surgery in 2008, Marcum appeared to come back strong this year and with another year of recovery appears to be poised to be even better moving away from the tough AL East.  Pitching 195 innings last year, Marcum struck out 7.6 per nine and only walked 1.98 per nine during that span, giving up 1.1 home runs, resulting in a 3.64 ERA in the toughest division in baseball; not too shabby.  Like Grienke, I also expect Marcum to benefit enormously from being in the more pitcher friendly league, which should only boost his already expanding value that netted him 3.5WAR last year while really still recovering from major surgery.  The combination of those two factors could easily see Marcum’s value go up by a win or more next year, making both him and Grienke formidable opponents for the rest of the NL Central.

Along with the young fireballer Yovani Gallardo (9.73 K/9, 3.84ERA 4.6WAR), Randy Wolf and Chris Narveson, it’s easy to see the Brewers going from a 77 win team from last year to a possibly 87 win team or more and competing for the NL Central Title. Although the Brewers undoubtedly gave up a lot of talented prospects to do it, and with teams like the defending champion Reds and the perennial contender Cardinals will undoubtedly make life difficult for them all year long, it is clear that these moves have turned the Brewers from an afterthought to a tough day at the ballpark because both Grienke and Marcum are young and cost controlled for the next handful of years.  Unfortunately for Milwaukee, with arguably their best player leaving for free agency next year, this window may be smaller than hoped, but as San Francisco showed this past season great starting pitching and a little bit of hitting is more than enough to get you far into the postseason and beyond. 

Just a note, with baseball season starting I’m going to try to be posting more (as well as possibly a guest post or two in there), but of course that’s all contingent on how much time I have with class and how much I can get myself to write when I’m not in class.  Thanks again for reading.  



                Much has been made the last few weeks and months about Michael Young, his value, and whether he will be traded before the start of the season among baseball circles.  For those who are not familiar, Young, the incumbent third baseman for the AL Champion Texas Rangers has been in flux since the signing of Adrian Beltre for five years $96million (the merits of this contract are dubious at best, but that’s for another day) to play the hot corner.  This is not the first time that the Rangers have made Young change his position for a superior player, having happened with the signing of Alex Rodriguez in 2000 when Young was moved to second,  only to be moved to shortstop after they  traded for Alfonso Soriano in 2004, and finally to third base before the 2009 season to make room for the highly touted shortstop prospect Elvis Andrus; all the same, it seems that this move has been all that Young could bear, and now he is demanding a trade from the Rangers to either the Cardinals, Yankees, Twins, Astros, Rockies, Dodgers, Angels, and the Padres (according to sources).  To be sure, for many teams the prospect of acquiring a six time All Star and Gold Glover to their teams is an exciting one, however there are financial and baseball concerns that make it unclear as to whether he’s “worth” it.  Indeed, at age 33 Young is not a young player by any stretch and to make matters worse he’s owned $48 million over the next three years, which isn’t exactly a bargain.  Nevertheless, it seems clear when compared to their in-house alternatives Michael Young would undoubtedly serve as a significant upgrade for several teams, notably the Colorado Rockies, provided they’re willing to pony up and take the good along with the bad.

                In many respects, Michael Young is the kind of ballplayer any team would love to have on their team.  A hard-working, team first guy, Young has been remarkably durable during his career, having played in at least 155 games every year, except for 2009 when he played 135; and when he’s been out there Young has done nothing but hit.  Indeed, since coming into the league in 2000, Young has had 1,848 hits, ranking 30th among active players, and amassed five 200 hit seasons, and it’s not hard to see why.  For anyone who has seen Michael play more than a few times, it becomes clear that Young is among the best at squaring up the ball on the bat, and his career line drive percentage of 24.1% (compared that to another great “pure” hitter Joe Mauer who’s line drive percentage is only 22.1%) shows that his reputation as a great pure hitter is clearly deserving.  These attributes, as well as his well-documented humility (evidently he’s called the Patron Saint of Sports Sacrifice by local sportswriters for his willingness to move positions so readily) Young has endeared himself to the media and fans alike as a true gamer and competitor, much deservingly earning the tile of Face of the Franchise of the Texas Rangers.

                Clearly, Michael Young has done a great deal in his time as a major leaguer to endear himself to baseball fans everywhere, however from a statistical perspective there is a lot to suggest that Michael is entering a decline phase from which he will likely not return to his All-Star form.  Indeed, in 2010 Young had arguably one of his worst seasons to date, hitting only .284/.330/.444, a stark contrast to his 2009 season when he hit .322/.374/.518, and a closer look at the numbers makes it clear that those numbers are a bit inflated.  Looking at his home/road splits, Young has severely missed the hitter friendly confines of Arlington Park, with a rather measly .753 OPS and 84 OPS+ on the road [note; 100 OPS+ is considered the baseline average replacement-level player] compared to his .859 OPS and 116 OPS+ at home.  On the other side of the diamond, Young has never been a great defender, but the numbers also show he’s slipped considerably with the glove as well, compiling a -5.8 UZR per 150 games at third base last year, down from -4.2 UZR/150 last year.  Even his numbers at other positions like shortstop and second base are no better, averaging a -10.4 UZR at short and a rather pedestrian -.5 at second respectively.  All in all, these numbers strongly suggest that Michael Young is a guy whose best days might be possibly behind him.   Sure it’s entirely possible that he regains his form of being a 200 hits a year guy, but at $16million a year that is a gamble that most teams are not financially able to take.

                Now, all that negative stuff said about Michael Young, here’s why I think that this is a gamble for at least one team, the Rockies.  For those who weren’t following or don’t care to remember, the Rockies fell short of the postseason last year after petering out in October, and in all likelihood part of that decline came from the lack of a viable candidate at second base.  Indeed, for the season a collection of such notable bums like Clint Barmes, Jonathan Herrera, Eric Young Jr., and Melvin Mora totaled an absolutely horrific stat line of .246 batting average, six home runs and 63 RBIs while playing second base, and in truth things aren’t looking any better next season.  Since last year the incumbent Barmes was shipped off to Houston, leaving only Eric Young Jr., as the de-facto second baseman and his numbers are even worse at .244/.312/.285, with little coming down the pipeline that is better.  To be sure, a team that with star power like Troy Tulowitski and Carlos Gonzalez that hopes to contend the Rockies simply cannot afford to have such a gaping hole in their lineup, which is why trading for  a guy like Michael Young makes a whole lot of sense.  Now granted, Young has not played second base regularly for some time and in truth considering his numbers at short and third chances are he’ll be crappy with the glove, but his bat more than makes up for it. Indeed, even if he duplicates his current batting line, Young’s OPS is a solid .200 points higher than any other option they have internally and in fact Young’s career low batting average to balls in play (.311 to .350) suggests that he will be even better in Colorado.  Add in the fact that Young is moving to the National League West and Coors Field, where the pitchers aren’t as good and Coors is arguably the only better hitters park than Arlington, Young could easily go back to being a 4 Wins Above Replacement Player in no time and dare I say it, the difference between Colorado contending and watching the playoffs from home.

               Of course, I am not privy to Colorado’s finances so I don’t know if they could swing this deal, but the numbers clearly show that Young would undeniably represent a serious upgrade for the Rockies.   Although his glove is undoubtedly suspect, and he may never have 200 hits in a season, the fact remains that Michael Young is still a very good ballplayer who can help a club in need.  Unfortunately for Texas, there is no longer a space for him on the team and in all likelihood they will have to pay to send him away, but for whichever team takes a chance on him will be getting a consummate professional and a pure hitter for much less than what he’s really worth.  

Thursday, February 3, 2011

So Long, Andy



The 2010-11 offseason for the New York Yankees has been to say the least, frustrating.  From the tenuous Derek Jeter contract negotiations that incited so much argument amongst the parties involved and the fans, to losing out on Cliff Lee after offering more money and more years than the Phillies, to signing “reclamation project” pitchers like Bartolo Colon, and now the final nail in the coffin, the great Andy Pettitte has announced his retirement, it’s not exactly been a great time for the Yanks.  To be sure, by all objective measures the Yankees are still in a great position to at least compete for a division title coming off a 95 win season, and their failures pale in comparison to say the Mets and their financial woes or the countless other small market teams who are resigned to being cellar dwellers another year, but this isn’t just any team, this is the Yankees, and the Yankees are supposed to compete.  Now for pretty much any other team, those kinds of expectations are crazy, but especially for Yankee fans my age that’s the only reality we know.  To put the Yankees dominance in perspective, just this last week a 42 year old relief pitcher named Russ Springer retired this last week after 18 seasons in the big leagues.  The significance?  That same relief pitcher was briefly on the 1992 New York Yankees in his rookie season, the last season the Yankees didn’t go at least .500, and Russ is the last active player to have played on a sub-.500 Yankee team.  Think about that, there isn’t a player in the league who can say he’s been on a losing Yankee team, how did the Yankees accomplish such a feat?  What have the Yankees done to defy the odds for so long and find ways to produce a winning product for a generation?  The detractors out there will point to the Yankees’ unparalled resources to their success, but in truth much of the answer to this question lies with the contributions of Andy Pettitte.  Although Andy would not actually start pitching until 1995, Andy his 16 seasons in the big leagues was a big reason why the Yankees have been so successful for all these years, and task of filling his shoes will be more challenging than we know.

If one were to look at Andy Pettitte simply by his numbers it can be difficult to truly encapsulate his value to the Yankees (and the Astros for three years) because by in large his statistics aren’t that fantastic. Indeed, in sixteen seasons, Andy complied 240 wins, a 3.88 ERA, 2,251 strikeouts to 962 walks (coming out to a 2.34 K/BB ratio) in the regular season, and none of those numbers really scream “Hall of Famer.”  Even his much lauded postseason resume, where he holds the record for most postseason wins at 19, Andy’s numbers are really not as impressive when you consider the fact that he benefitted from being on the Yankees during a run they were always in the playoffs, as well as the introduction of the wild card in 1995.  What’s more, his numbers for the postseason are pretty much in line with his career numbers with a 3.83ERA and a 2.40 K/BB ratio, so even on the biggest stage he’s had his ups and downs too.  But in truth conventional statistics don’t really speak to Andy Pettitte’s greatness and why he was one of my favorite players.  Emma Span at BronxBanterblog.com I think put it best today saying;

Even more so in his later years, when he relied less on stuff and more on control and, for lack of a better phrase, know-how. The stat-head in me hates using wishy washy phrases like that — he had grit! he was gutty! — but like I said, when it comes to Pettitte I really can’t help myself. 

Much like Emma, I too hate having to rely on baseball clichés when talking about Andy, but there’s really no other way to describe how he did it.  What I mean by that becomes clearer when you look at Andy’s seasons one by one, even his excellent ones, which shows that even though he didn’t blow anybody away, and he wasn’t exactly Greg Maddux with his control, at the end of the day Andy just got it done.  Take for instance Andy’s 1996 season, where he was arguably the best pitcher on the team as a 21 year old and he complied a record of 21-8 to the tune of a 3.87ERA, but he gave up 229 hits in 221 innings, only struck out 162 while walking 72, and he gave up 23 home runs, 23!  Keep in mind this is arguably Andy’s best season, and even then no one would confuse him for Sandy Koufax, but it didn’t matter because he won.  I remember watching Andy that season as a fourth grader and just being amazed at this guy and how he did what he had to do to win games for the Yankees, and he kept doing it year after year.  Whether it be the World Series, a big weekend at Boston, or even a forgettable Monday night game against Baltimore, Andy has always been a guy you felt like you had a chance to win with when he’s on the mound, and that’s more than you can say about most.

It’s hard to be angry at Pettitte for deciding that he had enough after sixteen seasons, but the selfish fan in me wishes he could’ve given us just a little more because I loved watching him so much.  Even when he left town for Houston, or when he admitted to having used Human Growth Hormone, myself and the rest of Yankee fans always forgave him immediately because he was always seemed so gracious, so down to earth, and most of all a winner (I’m just full of baseball clichés today, Pettitte brings the worst out of me).  I remember a story a friend told me about the 2009 World Series before the sixth and series clinching game, and he and his buddies were tailgating outside before the game.  As they’re sitting in the Yankee Stadium parking lot they see Andy drive by and he saw them all freaking out cheering for him at the top of their lungs, and what does he do?  He gets out fired up as hell and starts giving them high-fives telling them he’s going to “fuck shit up” and win this game; that’s the kind of guy his is.  What made me love watching Andy so much was that  even when he wasn’t feeling it or was getting knocked around a little he just seemed to want it more than the other guy, and when it mattered most in the big spots he wanted the ball and was going to give everything he’s got to beat the other man.  Maybe that doesn’t make him a Hall of Famer, and maybe the less Yankee-friendly statheads will roll their collective eyes at my anecdotal evidence, but that’s enough for me because that’s all I can ask for as a fan.  Thanks Andy.